How An Adyar Leader Tampered
With the Book “The Voice of
the Silence”
Alice Leighton Cleather

Alice
Leighton Cleather (1846-1938) remained loyal to ethics
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Editorial Note:
The following text
is reproduced from the book “H. P.
Blavatsky - A Great Betrayal”, by Mrs. Alice
Leighton
Cleather (Thacker,
Spink & Co., Calcutta, India, 1922,
96 pp.). It is in
pages 71-74, and it is the first part of
the
chapter entitled “Tampering With H.P. Blavatsky’s
Writings”. Alice Cleather was one of the closest
disciples
of H.P.B.’s, in her final years in London. In the
paragraphs
previous to the present
text Mrs. Cleather discusses (p. 70)
the fiasco of Annie
Besant as a disciple, after H.P.B.’s death.
The first
failure happened according to Cleather by doubting
her teacher,
H.P.B., and by adopting orthodox Hinduism in
India in 1893.
“Bound up with this failure (.....) was her attack
on her fellow chela Mr. [William] Judge.” The second failure
was the protection
and reinstatement of Charles W. Leadbeater
after he had been
rightfully expelled by Henry Olcott from the
Adyar Society in
1906. In fact, soon after that episode, Olcott
died in February
1907 after making a severe self-criticism for his
lack of loyalty
towards H.P. Blavatsky and William Q. Judge.[1]
Mrs. Cleather
starts the text, then, mentioning Besant’s first failure.
(Carlos Cardoso
Aveline)
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
The result of Mrs. Besant’s
first failure, through harbouring doubts of her Teacher’s bona fides and esoteric knowledge, was soon manifested when she
began to publish new editions of H. P. B.’s works.
The first noteworthy example
was her excision from “The Voice of the Silence” of passages and notes,
presumably out of deference to Brahmin sentiment, which then governed her
actions. One of the last verses in “The Two Paths” (the second of the “Three
Fragments” forming the little book) in the original edition (1889) begins thus:
“He who becomes Pratyeka
Buddha, makes his obeisance but to his Self.” In a footnote H. P. B. explains
that “Pratyeka Buddhas are those Bodhisattvas who strive after and often reach
the Dharmakaya robe after a series of lives. Caring nothing for the woes of
mankind or to help it, but only for their own bliss, they enter Nirvana and - disappear from the sight and the
hearts of men. In Northern Buddhism a ‘Pratyeka Buddha’ is a synonym of
spiritual Selfishness.”
In Mrs. Besant’s edition both
the passage and the footnote I have quoted are omitted. Her reason for this
unscrupulous proceeding is given in a footnote on p. 416 of the so-called
“third volume” of “The Secret Doctrine”. In this note Mrs. Besant, from the
heights of her then newly-acquired Brahmanical wisdom, adopts the following
dictatorial and censorious tone towards her late Teacher:
“The Pratyeka Buddha stands on
the level of the Buddha [!], but His work for the world has nothing to do with
its teaching, and His office has always been surrounded with mystery. The
preposterous [sic] view that He, at
such superhuman height of power, wisdom and love could be selfish, is found in
the exoteric books, though it is hard to see how it can have arisen. H. P. B. charged me to correct the mistake, as she
had, in a careless moment, copied such a statement elsewhere. - A. B.” [2]
Observe the assumption of
superior knowledge to H. P. B.’s, and the use of the words “preposterous” and
“careless.” To any real Oriental chela such an attitude towards his Guru would be simply unthinkable; but we
have seen how very quickly Mrs. Besant believed herself to have soared far
above the “chela on probation” state of her H. P. B. days into that of an
“Initiate” and future “Supreme Ruler of the World of Gods and men.” To such
vanity and self-delusion everything is possible. How different was the attitude
of the real Occultist who was spoken
of by the Masters as “Our Brother H. P. B.,” yet called herself “a Chela of one
of Them”!
The passage I have italicised
in the above footnote by Mrs. Besant is untrue on the face of it to anyone who
knew, as I did, the loving care with which H. P. B. prepared this unique little
book of “Golden Precepts.” Moreover, she states in her Preface that the verses
given are selected from a much larger number which she “learnt by heart.”
Further, H. P. B. not only repeated but
greatly amplified this statement about the Pratyeka Buddha in her “Theosophical
Glossary”, a fact which Mrs. Besant had evidently forgotten when she concocted
the footnote quoted above. [3] The
Pratyeka Buddha is doubtless much that Mrs. Besant claims for him, but she does
not seem to know, or has probably forgotten, that there are two classes of Masters, two “Paths” (as this very section of “The
Voice of the Silence” shows); that the “Pairs of Opposites” obtain on all
planes of Manifestation and Being, right up to the threshold of the Unmanifested
- the ONE; that, while there are Masters
of COMPASSION, there must of necessity exist also the opposite pole - the
wearers of the “Dharmakaya robe,” with all the power and knowledge which that
state implies, without that Compassion
which alone makes a Master of the “Right Hand Path”. [4]
It was a great and valuable
feature of H. P. B.’s method that she taught us to reason on these lines,
checking everything by the Law of Correspondences. But Mrs. Besant has
evidently long since abandoned this, and prefers the sacerdotal plan of
accepting everything on “authority,” which in her present phase means Leadbeater
or her own psychic delusions. The “World Teacher” dogma is a case in point. She
asserts it as a fact to be accepted because she says it; whereas, as I have
shown, it is untenable in the light of “The Secret Doctrine” (see ante p. 2) [5], which endorses Oriental tradition
and cyclic law.
Mrs. Besant’s partiality for
the Pratyeka Buddha, however, may possibly be explained by some words that H.
P. B. once wrote of her to Mr. Judge: - “She is not psychic or spiritual in the
least - all intellect.” For H. P. B. opens her paragraph in the “Theosophical
Glossary” on the Pratyeka Buddha with these words: - “The Pratyeka Buddha is a
degree which belongs exclusively to the Yogacharya school ..... one of high intellectual development with no true
spirituality”. (Italics mine.) Moreover, we have the authority of the Maha
Chohan Himself (the Head of the Trans-Himalayan Brotherhood) for the statement
that even Nirvana is, “after all, but an exalted and glorious selfishness.”
NOTES:
[1] Both Leadbeater’s
expulsion and Olcott’s self-criticism for his absence of loyalty towards Judge
and Blavatsky are narrated in books published by the Adyar Theosophical
Society. Leadbeater was accused of being
a criminal and invited by a Committee to resign to his membership of the Society.
He was warned that if he did not resign, he would be formally expelled. He
resigned. [See “A Short History of the
Theosophical Society”, Josephine Ransom, with a preface by George Arundale,
TPH, Adyar, 591 pp., 1938, p. 358.] Olcott’s
self-criticism before his death is described in the book “Damodar and the
Pioneers of the Theosophical Movement”, by Sven Eek, TPH, Adyar, second
printing, 1978, 720 pp., see pp. 656-659
and also p. 628. (CCA)
[2] This note by Annie
Besant is still present at the Adyar TPH editions and / or reimpressions of 1968,
1971, 1978, 1982, 1983 and 1988. In the
miniature edition of “The Voice of the Silence” published in 1988, the note is
at pp. 180-181. It also appears at
Besant’s version of “The Secret Doctrine” (1897 / 1938 / 1971). In the 1971
edition, the note is at Volume V, p. 399, footnote. Besant’s illegitimate version of “The Secret
Doctrine” was finally abandoned in 1979, when the Adyar Society published a correct edition of the work,
prepared by Boris de Zirkoff. (CCA)
[3] [Note by Alice Cleather:] See also “An
Introduction to Mahayana Buddhism”, by W. M. McGovern, 1922, Kegan Paul. He
confirms H. P. B.’s definition.
[4] [Note by Alice Cleather:] “It was ..… during the highest point of
civilisation and knowledge, as also of human intellectuality, of ….. the
Atlantean Race that ..… humanity branched off into its two diametrically
opposite paths; the Right and the Left-hand paths of knowledge or of Vidya. “Thus were the germs of the White and the
Black Magic sown in those days. The seeds lay latent for some time, to sprout
only during the early period of the Fifth (our Race).” (Commentary). - “The Secret Doctrine”, First Edition,
Vol. I, p. 192.
[5] Alice Cleather is
referring to her book “H.P. Blavatsky, a Great Betrayal”, p. 2, including the footnote. (CCA)
000
In September
2016, after a careful analysis of the state of the esoteric movement
worldwide, a group of students decided to form the Independent Lodge of Theosophists, whose priorities include the building
of a better future in the different dimensions of life.
000