On the Feeling of
Respect for One’s Teacher
Carlos Cardoso Aveline
Carlos Cardoso Aveline
Helena P. Blavatsky and Henry S. Olcott
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000
The following text reproduces Chapter
Four of
the book “The Fire and Light of Theosophical
Literature”,
Carlos Cardoso Aveline, The
Aquarian Theosophist, Portugal, 255
pp., 2013.
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
“They that love beyond the World,
cannot be separated by it. Death cannot kill,
what never dies. Nor can Spirits ever be divided
that love and live in the same Divine Principle;
the Root and Record of their Friendship.”
(William Penn) [1]
To be able to
defend one’s teacher from slander and persecution is a high privilege for
theosophists who have any real
knowledge of esoteric philosophy and its ethical implications.
The beneficial
effects of such a defense should be identified and remembered. It is in a way a
fortunate circumstance that since the 1880s theosophists have had a number of
occasions to defend Helena P. Blavatsky from slanderers of various kinds. If
the same theosophists were situated in different points in time, they would
defend other sages.
Pythagoras,
Socrates, Lucius Seneca, Hypatia, St. John of the Cross, Paracelsus, Giordano
Bruno, Baruch Spinoza, Alessandro Cagliostro and HPB all suffered persecution,
and they are no exceptions in History. Examples are countless. The legendary
story of Jesus in the Gospels illustrates a fact that can be seen everywhere,
at all times. Wise people challenge the routines of organized ignorance, thus
becoming the object of criticism. For millennia now, nearly every brave soul
who worked in favor of mankind’s evolution has been in one way or another
attacked by his contemporaries. A Master of Wisdom wrote:
“It has ever been
thus. Those who have watched mankind through the centuries of this cycle, have
constantly seen the details of this death-struggle between Truth and Error
repeating themselves. Some of you Theosophists are now only wounded in your
‘honour’ or your purses, but those who held the lamp in preceding generations
paid the penalty of their lives for their knowledge. Courage then, you all, who
would be warriors of the one divine Verity…”
Whenever a teacher
of universal wisdom is unjustly attacked, the Law of Karma creates an
opportunity for his or her students to preserve the common source of learning
and create good karma for themselves and for others.
Through active
solidarity, the learner enhances his magnetic link with the Messenger and with
the Wisdom behind the Messenger. By omission, he has his link to the source
either damaged or destroyed. The challenge is both individual and collective;
entire societies may fail the test.
An event in the
early days of the theosophical movement illustrates the karmic consequences of
failing to defend one’s Teacher.
During the late
1870s, Henry S. Olcott, the co-founder of the theosophical movement, met a man
in the streets of New York and stopped to chat with him for a few moments.
Olcott wrote in his autobiographical work “Old Diary Leaves”:
“He was very
prejudiced against H.P.B., and spoke very harshly against her, keeping to his
opinion despite all I could say. At last he used such objectionable language
that, in sheer disgust, I hastily left him and went on my way.”
A few hours later,
when Olcott was at home, a paper got materialized in front of him. It was a
copy of three paragraphs from the Buddhist “Dhammapada” and one from the
“Sutras”. The text came with the signature from one of the Adept-Teachers and a
two-word message which simply said:
“Translation
correct.”
Olcott explained:
“The verses were
reproaches to my address for having allowed H.P.B. to be reviled without
defending her; unmistakably referring to my encounter down town with the person
I had met, although no names were mentioned.”
The importance of
this event is that the lesson given by the message with the quotation from the
“Dhammapada” and the “Sutras” is not limited to the past. The message remains
valid for students of HPB in the 21st century and in the next centuries. The
paragraphs quoted by the Master and sent to Olcott give every student real food
for thought. The three main paragraphs say:
* “He
who hears his brother reviled, and keeping a smooth face leaves the abuse
unnoticed, tacitly agrees with the enemy, as if he admitted the same to be
proper and just. He who does it is either mouse-hearted, or selfishness is at
the bottom of his heart. He is not fit as yet to become a ‘companion’.”
* “Revenge is
sinful and throws the ‘companion’ in the embrace of Zahak. He who permits his
left hand to be polluted with dung without immediately wiping it with his right
cares little for the cleanliness of his whole body. What constitutes the
integral? - Parts. Of what is composed a human body? - Of limbs. If one limb
cares not for the appearance of another limb, is not Zahak ready with trowel
and brush to blacken the whole? Such a ‘companion’ is not ready to become a
Brother.”
* “It is easy to
destroy the poisonous houâbà in its first germination. It is difficult to
arrest its progress when once allowed to mature. Its unhealthy emanations will
fill the atmosphere with miasmas. It will spread and infect its healthy
brethren and cause the limpid waters of the lake to stagnate and dry. Avoid the
houâbà and its husbandman, Beloved.”
The message from
the Master is as clear as it could be. It did not prevent Henry Olcott from
making other mistakes along the same line, later on. It is comparatively easy
by now to see Olcott’s mistakes. Instead of dwelling too much on that, one
should ask oneself:
“What about my own
failings?”
No one should
think he or she is necessarily better situated than Olcott in this regard:
self-examination often brings us surprises, and John Garrigues wrote about
one’s correct attitude towards Helena P. Blavatsky and other teachers of the
past:
“These Great
Beings the sincere student must come to feel and to know as not dead nor in
some distant retreat, but ever near and ever potent like the magic of some
resistless power, as a mighty rushing river.”
[5]
Life is
probationary, and human loyalty takes place within conditions given by
historical and karmic cycles. In the 21st century, the theosophical movement is
getting to the third and best moment of its evolution so far, as the next
Chapter attempts to show.
NOTES:
[1] “The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin, The Journal
of John Woolman, Fruits of Solitude,
William Penn”, Harvard Classics, P.F. Collier & Son, New York, 1909, 416
pp., p. 402.
[2] “The Mahatma
Letters”, Transcribed by A.T. Barker, T.U.P., Pasadena, California, see Letter
LV, p. 322. A facsimile of these words is included at the opening of Part One
in the present volume.
[3] “Old Diary Leaves”, H. S. Olcott, First Series, TPH,
Adyar, 1974, 490 pp., see pp. 414-415. See also “Letters from the Masters of
the Wisdom”, Second Series, TPH, 1973, p. 49.
[4] “Letters from the Masters of the Wisdom”, Second
Series, transcribed by C. Jinarajadasa, Theosophical Publishing House, Adyar,
Madras, India, 1973. See Letter 23, pp. 47-49. We did not find these passages
in the versions of the “Dhammapada” that are presently available to us and to
the public.
[5] John Garrigues (1868-1944) in his article “How Far
Away is H.P. Blavatsky?”, which can be found at our websites. It was first
published with no indication as to its author in “Theosophy” magazine, Los
Angeles, May 1922 edition, pp.197-198.
000
Here is a one-minute contemplative video, produced by our
associated websites:
000
On the role of the esoteric movement in the
ethical awakening of mankind during the 21st century, see the book “The Fire and Light of Theosophical Literature”, by
Carlos Cardoso Aveline.
Published in
2013 by The Aquarian Theosophist,
the volume has 255 pages and can be obtained through Amazon Books.
000
