Aug 26, 2025

Thoughts Along the Road - 87

 

A Master Reveals Who, After All, Can Be
Able To Understand the Law of Brotherhood
 
Carlos Cardoso Aveline




* It is not difficult to make real progress along the spiritual path. A constant effort to do one’s best powerfully expands the positive aspects of human life. However, short term illusions should be rejected from the start in one’s practice of detachment, equilibrium, and discernment. And new levels of illusion will appear that and must be rejected from time to time as we learn about the truth.

* Concentration needs purification. And no one can purify his own consciousness from the astral garbage of modern times, except by having an elevated object of concentration for his soul. And the other way around: the pilgrim must purify himself, leaving aside the lower levels of mind and their usual rubbish, in order to be able to concentrate on something that is really worthy of his attention. Detachment is necessary in both processes. So is discernment.

* In the search for transcendent truth, the living structure of self-discipline allows the pilgrim to learn. One’s daily discipline must be outwardly flexible, so as to have inner stability.  How to combine creativity and firmness, however, is a rather complex matter which depends on the right kind of attention and a correct observation of accumulated experience, from the point of view of one’s highest goal.  

* Present humanity must avoid exaggerating the importance of the mental principle. All levels of life matter: thoughts and images cannot replace deep feelings and responsible actions. Due to the exaggeration of the mental world, we are surrounded in Western nations by mental noise and useless information.

* An excessive amount of unnecessary news actively misguides people. Real information is that which helps us live better, and which inspires the best in us.

* While carefully observing the world, the sensible pilgrim acts in that which depends on him. The main items in his agenda are, first, correctly managing his own mental and emotional atmosphere as he faces the challenges of life; and second, expanding his ability to develop right actions, here and now.

Who Can Understand Theosophy?

* A master of the wisdom wrote: “It is he alone who has the love of humanity at heart, who is capable of grasping thoroughly the idea of a regenerating practical Brotherhood who is entitled to the possession of our secrets. He alone, such a man - will never misuse his powers, as there will be no fear that he should turn them to selfish ends.” (Letter XXXVIII, p. 252, in “The Mahatma Letters”.)

The Practice of Silence in Daily Life

* Calm and silence must be daily cultivated in our century. That means leaving aside many attractive yet purposeless facts, novelties, challenges, invitations and expectations coming from outside.

* To be poor, to lead a simple life, to work with tranquillity, and to look like meaningless to others: these are significant factors, if you want to have time and energy to manage your own inner life, and be effective in your efforts to help a noble cause. A Master said that a sermon can be preached even through a stone (Letters from the Masters of the Wisdom).

* Choose one or two of the ideas from the above paragraphs which can be useful to you in practical ways. Take a minute to observe them in silence. Decide to keep them alive in your memory.

000

The article “Thoughts Along the Road - 87” was published on the websites of the Independent Lodge of Theosophists on 26 August 2025.  An initial version of it is part of the October 2022 edition of “The Aquarian Theosophist”, pp. 13-14.         

000

Read more:





000

Print the texts you study from the websites of the Independent Lodge. Reading on paper helps us attain a deeper view of philosophical texts. When studying a printed text, the reader can underline sentences and make handwritten comments in the margins that link the ideas to his personal reality.

000



Helena Blavatsky (photo) wrote these words: “Deserve, then desire”.

000


 
 

Aug 22, 2025

The Danger of Anger in Theosophy

 
The Roots of All Lower Feelings Deserve to Be
Under Careful Observation, Seven Days a Week
 
Carlos Cardoso Aveline
 



Anger is not a beautiful thing to see.  Yet one should avoid its contagion effect: it is not wise to become too indignant before it.

If you get excessively rancorous at angry people, it might mean that you are envious of them, and would like to be as spontaneous as they are in their natural ignorance and childish inclination to destroy. If we prefer not to abandon our balanced state of mind, the correct thing to do is to remember that anger is a form of psychic and spiritual disease and paves the way to physical ailments.

Individually, persistent anger reduces or destroys the contact with one’s own spiritual soul. A large-scale collective hatred helps provoke social crisis, civil war and wars among nations.

Certainly, as H.P. Blavatsky writes, repressing anger is often the ultimate accomplishment in hypocrisy. And hypocrisy feeds anger.

“No ‘Cultured’ man or woman will ever show anger in Society”, says HPB. “To check and restrain every sign of annoyance shows good manners, certainly, but also considerable achievement in hypocrisy and dissimulation. There is an occult side to this rule of good breeding expressed in an Eastern proverb: ‘Trust not the face which never shows signs of anger, nor the dog that never barks’. Cold-blooded animals are the most venomous.” [1] 

The twin attitudes of constant ill-will and falsehood towards others are the children of spiritual ignorance and lack of discernment, and often feed one another. An occasional expression of moderate anger or similar feelings like arrogance and ambition is better than a sort of neurotic repression that will make these feelings become deeper and harder to observe, leading them to be disguised and protected by cunning and malice.

It is a rule with esoteric philosophy - as H.P. Blavatsky says in “Isis Unveiled” - not to hide too much one’s mistakes; and not to make propaganda of one’s supposed accomplishments along the road to wisdom. One should avoid the mask of false perfection used by those who have a Ph. D. in hypocrisy. These are the “whited sepulchres” on whom Jesus delivered one of his most fiery - if not angry - sermons in the New Testament. 

Moderate irritation plays therefore a positive role in life.  

As an expression of frustration, anger may be the agent of self-respect, after a long period of profound suffering. It may defend truth, when it has been attacked by the enemies of sincerity. Irritation usually gives way to more constructive and positive emotions, especially if it is observed with respect, rather than blindly condemned or repressed.

Theosophically, the Causes of anger are more important than its Symptoms.

In the writings of Helena Blavatsky and in the Mahatma Letters one learns that Initiates are not smiling-machines distributing unmerited benedictions to all. Anger is linked to rejection, just as the love felt by lower selves is linked to attachment. Both feelings have the nature of desire. 

Attachments and rejections are forms of suffering.  And sadists and masochists alike have a sickly pleasure in pain.

The roots of all lower feelings deserve to be under careful observation, seven days a week. They feed the sense of Ahamkara or personal self. Wisdom comes from perceiving the symmetry and the equilibrium between blind attraction and that kind of rejection which can see nothing. 

Crosbie, on Being Charitable

There is sometimes the temptation to get furious at other people’s mistakes, after considering oneself as morally far superior to them. This usually occurs while ignoring one’s own mistakes, or at least superficially convincing oneself that they are irrelevant.

Robert Crosbie wrote:

“At a late meeting the question of being charitable to the weaknesses of others came up for discussion, and brought out quite a lengthy talk on why that attitude is absolutely necessary, from the standpoint of the spiritual Ego, for right development in the mind of spiritual perception and knowledge. It was pointed out that all the errors of any life result in reality from a diseased - if not insane, at least, un-sane mentality. An imperfection is an imperfection - the difference in kind not being anything that anyone should pride himself upon.”

“Our duty is not to rid our neighbors of their imperfections, but ourselves of our own. The pride that results from fancied virtue was spoken of; judgment in anger - that the anger passes but the judgment remains as a bias in the mind, and a hindrance to the one judged; the danger of thus standing in the way of another, to say nothing of the reactionary effect on ourselves. The talk came up because of the tendency of minds in general to pride themselves upon not having the defects that others have, while at the same time they may exhibit defects, which, while not so obvious - as generally classed by the world - are yet worse, because of being deeper seated and harder to eradicate, as well as being more widely injurious.” [2]

Crosbie is right as usual.

And being charitable with mistakes, including our own, does not mean we accept them as they are. However, the right way to counteract mistakes - mainly ours own, and secondarily those belonging to others - is to promote the correct actions which are opposite to the failures, as suggested in the Aphorisms of Yoga of Patanjali.

Mistakes can only be corrected in the presence of both the will and the ability to humbly see them, in the first place, and then promote an entirely different kind of action, which can heal the corresponding wound of the soul. A solid feeling of goodwill is necessary, together with self-esteem and confidence in Life and in the One Law.

Boris de Zirkoff wrote:

“We should also remember that what we see in others is quite often what others see in us. We are mirrors to each other. Though differing outwardly, we all partake of the same fundamental consciousness - the consciousness of the One Universal Self. Viewed in this light, men are but life-atoms of a vast evolutionary current that flows from age to age.” [3]

Anger is a dangerous form of wasting vital energies. The habit of irritation destroys one’s astral life, thus reducing physical vitality. Anger is a serious obstacle in martial arts.  It has the same substance of fear.

No danger can be lucidly confronted if one is blinded by irritation, fear or hope. A warrior can only be effective if he is free from such personal emotions. Wise warriors are guided by their sense of inner peace and their love for right action.

The possibility of anger must be observed therefore from a deep, wide, and long-term perspective, so as to avoid its Cause, which is generally spiritual ignorance in one form or another.

NOTES:


[2] “The Friendly Philosopher”, Robert Crosbie, Theosophy Co., Los Angeles, 1945, 415 pp., “The Spirit in the Body”, letter twenty-nine, pp. 86-87.  

[3] From the article “The Life of Boris de Zirkoff”.

000

The article “The Danger of Anger in Theosophy” was published on the websites of the Independent Lodge of Theosophists on 22 August 2025.   

000

Read more:










000



Helena Blavatsky (photo) wrote these words: “Deserve, then desire”.

000


 

Aug 8, 2025

The Aquarian Theosophist, August 2025

 




The August edition of the Aquarian presents on page one the old, long forgotten text “Theosophy as a Catalyst”, which examines the Alchemical Process Caused by Wisdom.

Page three presents the philosophical and theosophically inclined poem “Not a Word”, whose verses have no punctuation marks. Its author, Vladislav Surkov, is seen by many as an influential adviser to the President of Russia, not formally, though.   

On page four, a short note by Boris de Zirkoff on Miguel de Molinos, the Spanish Mystic. On page five, a link to “Dwight Eisenhower, On Peace”.

Other topics:  

* “Occult Knowledge”, by Robert Crosbie. There Is One Absolute Principle Which is the Origin and the Container of All that Ever Was, Is, or Shall Be.

* Higher and Divine Feelings Are Essential in Real Philosophy. But One Must Defeat the Pruning Knife of the Stupid Pedant and Dogmatic Scientist. By Joseph Buchanan.

* Thoughts Along the Road. The Strengthening of Discernment and Spiritual Will Is One of the Goals of Evolution.

* A Magic Legend from the Azores: Trouble When One Is Young. The Story of a Maid’s Choice, by Elsie Spicer Eells.

* A link toCommentaries to the Golden Stairs”. Observing Fourteen Ideas That Sum Up the Theosophical Path

The August edition has 21 pages.   



000

The above edition of The Aquarian was published on 8 August 2025, as a beneficent conjunction of Venus and Jupiter was starting in the astrological sky.   

The entire collection of the journal is available HERE.

Give your friends a practical tool to better understand themselves, and better understand the world. Invite them to join the study-group E-Theosophy in Google Groups.

000



Helena Blavatsky (photo) wrote these words: “Deserve, then desire”.

000


Aug 3, 2025

The Loneliness of the Half-Breed

 
More than a Bridge Between Asia and the
West: Looking at the Past and Future of Russia
 
Vladislav Surkov

St. Basil’s Cathedral in Moscow. Helena Blavatsky wrote that Russia is “the only
country where the pure ideal of Christ is still preserved”.  You can find her words HERE.



000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

A 2025 Editorial Note

The following text has deep theosophical interest.  It
was first published by the English language quarterly
journal “Russia in Global Affairs”,  on 28 May 2018.

Theosophists and readers in general are invited
to study the article “The Loneliness of the
Half-Breed” from the point of view of the work
The Secret Doctrine”, by Helena P. Blavatsky.  

(Carlos Cardoso Aveline)

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000



Jobs vary. Doing some right is possible only in a mood slightly different from normal. A media industry soldier, a rank-and-file news provider working in the field as a rule is a person in a deranged state of mind, a fever, if you wish. This can surprise no one. The news business is done in a rush: you’ve got to find out what’s new earlier than everybody else, report the news faster than the others and also be the first to explain what it means.

The excitement of those who inform spills onto those being informed. The excited are certain their own excitement is a thinking process and even its substitute. Small wonder such durables as “beliefs” and “principles” are pushed into the background to give way to disposable “opinions”. Hence the heaps of forecasts doomed to fall flat. Nobody looks confused, though. That’s the price to be paid for keeping up the speed of the breaking news flow.

Amid this media noise the tacit irony of fate is audible only to select few. By and large people seldom care to learn there is slow, fundamental news that does not float on the surface of troubled waters of everyday life, but rises from the depth, where geopolitical currents and historical epochs collide head-on. The real meaning reaches us only after a long while, but learning it is never too late.

The 14th year of this century will be remembered for some important and some very important developments everybody knows about and has discussed many a time. But the greatest of those events is just beginning to display its true meaning. This slowly traveling message from deep space has just begun to reach our ears. The breaking news is Russia’s epic westward quest is finally over. Repeated and invariably abortive attempts to become part and parcel of the Western civilization, to get into the “good family” of European nations have ground to a final halt.

Beyond 2014 there lies an indefinitely long period, Era 14 Plus, in which we are destined to a hundred years (or possibly two hundred or three hundred) of geopolitical loneliness.

Westernization attempts, so lightmindedly started by False Dmitry [1] and resolutely continued by Peter the Great, varied in nature and scale. Russia resorted to no end of tricks in a bid to pass for an equal of Holland, France, America or Portugal. It tried to elbow its way into the West real hard. Whatever ideas might have emerged and whatever upheavals might have occurred there, our ruling elite always responded with much enthusiasm. Occasionally with too much enthusiasm.

Our monarchs eagerly married German brides, the imperial nobility and bureaucracy readily absorbed “vagabond strangers”. Oddly enough, European re-settlers to Russia got promptly Russianized more often than not, while Russians showed little intention to get Westernized, if at all.

The Russian army attained triumphant victories in all big wars in Europe, whose record of military conflicts is a reason enough to rate it as a continent more bloodthirsty and more prone to mass violence than any other. With its great victories and tremendous sacrifices Russia gained many territories in the West but made no friends.

For the sake of European values (in those days religious and monarchic ones) St. Petersburg volunteered to act as the architect and guarantor of the Holy Alliance of three monarchies. And it diligently and painstakingly complied with its duties of an ally when the Habsburg Dynasty was to be rescued from the Hungarian uprising. But when Russia found itself in a precarious position, though, Austria did not lift a finger to help it, but on the contrary turned to foe.

With the passage of time a new generation of European values took over. Karl Marx came into fashion in Paris and Berlin. Some natives of Simbrisk and Yanovka wished to turn everything the Paris way. They were very afraid of falling behind the West, which at that time was obsessed with socialism. They were extremely worried a future European and American working class-led world revolution would leave their remote “God-forsaken” corner of the world neglected. They worked real hard. When the class struggle storms eventually died down, the USSR, which had taken years of hard toil to build, suddenly discovered that the Western world had turned capitalist, and not peasant-and-working class way. And that the growing symptoms of autistic socialism will have to be carefully hidden behind the Iron Curtain.

At the end of last century the country began to feel bored with its “uniqueness” and knocked on the door to the West. In doing so some thought that size matters: there is not enough room for us in Europe, we are too big and expansive to fit in. Frightfully big. This means the territory, the population, the economy, the army, and the ambitions are to be downsized to those of an average European country. Then we will certainly be invited to step in. We agreed to shrink. We began to worship Hayek as fiercely as we had worshiped Marx. We slashed the demographic, industrial and military potential by half. We turned our backs on the other Soviet republics and were about to say good-bye to the autonomies… But even a downsized and humble Russia proved unable to negotiate the turn towards the West.

Lastly, a decision was made to do away with downscaling and downsizing and, what is more, to come out with a declaration of rights. The events of 2014 were unavoidable.

However similar the Russian and European cultural models, they run on different software and have incompatible interfaces. They are not destined to be plugged together into a common system. Now, that this old-time suspicion has turned into a fact of life, some have been wondering if it is worth taking a turn the other way, towards the East and Asia.

It is not. I can explain why. Russia has already been there.

The Moscow proto-empire emerged in the process of intricate military and political coworking with the Asian Horde, which some tend to describe as yoke, and others, as an alliance. Whether it was a yoke or alliance is beside the point. Willy-nilly, the eastern development vector was selected and tested.

Even after the Great Stand on the Ugra River the Tsardom of Russia essentially remained part of Asia. It eagerly took over lands in the East. It laid claim to the heritage of Byzantium -Asia’s counterpart of Rome. It remained under the great influence of noble families of Horde origin.

Moscow’s Asianism peaked with the appointment of Khan Simeon Bekbulatovich, of the Khanate of Qasim, as Grand Prince of all Rus. The historians who are accustomed to portraying Ivan the Terrible as an extravagant eccentric sporting Monomakh’s Cap attribute this escapade to his innate sense of humor. The reality was far more serious, though. After Grozny there emerged a strong royal party that wished to see Simeon Bekbulatovich as a ruler in his own right.

Boris Godunov even had to demand that the boyars who vowed allegiance to him should pledge they would never wish to see Simeon Bekbulatovich or his offspring on the throne. In other words, the state was just half a step away from being taken over by a dynasty of baptized Chingizides and firmly tied to the eastern development paradigm.

As it would soon turn out neither Bekbulatovich nor the Godunovs - descendants of a noble Golden Horde family - had a future. There followed a Polish-Cossack invasion that brought new tsars from the West. However brief the rules of False Dmitry, who long before Peter the Great dismayed the boyars by his European habits, and of Polish Prince Wladyslaw IV Vasa, both were rather symbolic. Against this background the Time of Trouble looks not so much a dynastic crisis as a civilizational one - Rus broke away from Asia and started its Europeward drift.

To cut a long story short, Russia had spent four centuries moving East and then another four centuries moving West. Attempts to take root failed in either case. Both roads were tried. These days the demand will be for third-way ideologies, third-type civilizations, a third world, a third Rome…

And yet it is very unlikely we are destined to become a third civilization. A dual, two-fold one is a more probable option. A civilization that has absorbed the East and the West. European and Asian at the same time, and for this reason neither quite Asian and nor quite European.

Our cultural and geopolitical identity is reminiscent of a volatile identity of the one born into a mixed-race family. He is everybody’s relative and non-native at the same time wherever he goes. He is at home among strangers and a stranger at home. He understands everybody and is understood by no one. A half-blood, a cross-breed, a weird-looking guy.

Russia is a Western-Eastern half-breed nation. With its double-headed statehood, hybrid mentality, intercontinental territory and bipolar history, it is charismatic, talented, beautiful and lonely. Just as a half-breed should be.

The wonderful phrase Emperor Alexander III never uttered -“Russia has only two allies: its army and navy” - is possibly the best-worded description of geopolitical loneliness which should have long been accepted as our fate. Of course, the list of the allies can be expanded to taste to include: factory workers and teachers, oil and gas, the creative class and patriotically-minded Internet bots, General Frost and Archangel Michael… The meaning will remain the same - we are our own allies.

What will the forthcoming loneliness look like? Will it be the loneliness of a middle-aged bachelor at the edge of the dance floor? Or the happy loneliness of the front runner, an alpha nation that has made rapid headway to leave all other peoples and states far behind? It depends on us. Loneliness does not spell isolation. Unlimited openness is likewise impossible. Either would be a repetition of the past mistakes. The future will have its own mistakes to make. Mistakes of the past are out of place there.

It is beyond doubt Russia will trade, draw investment, exchange knowledge, fight wars (war is a means of communication in a sense), participate in common undertakings, enjoy membership of organizations, compete and cooperate, and arouse awe, hatred, curiosity, affection, and admiration, but no longer with false goals and self-denial.

Life is going to be tough. A Russian rapper’s catchy phrase will come to mind over and over again: “There are thorns, more thorns and nothing but thorns all around! S…t! Where are the stars?”

The real thrill is ahead, and so are the stars.

NOTE:

[1] The words False Dmitry refer to various individuals who presented themselves as the deceased (and would-be resurrected) Tsarevich Dmitry Ivanovich of Russia, a son of Ivan the Terrible. (CCA)

000

The above article was published by the websites of the Independent Lodge of Theosophists on 3 August 2025.

For several years Vladislav Surkov was a special adviser to the President of Russia. He is generally seen as one of the main thinkers who helped Vladimir Putin shape present-day Russia. The 2022 novel “Le Mage du Kremlin”, by Giuliano da Empoli, is considered to be partially based on Surkov’s work in the Kremlin. The title of the book in English is “The Wizard of the Kremlin”. (CCA)

000

Read more:





* Moscow the Third Rome (a small book by Nicolas Zernov).

* Russia: The Putin Interviews (Vladimir V. Putin interviewed by Oliver Stone).

See the thematic section

000



Helena Blavatsky (photo) wrote these words: “Deserve, then desire”.

000